Pure thanks

Thanks to every reader for his support, especially the few days before and after the ban, it is everyone's efforts to keep "The Emperor of Ruzi" in the top ten of the historical classification list. ★★

On the last day, I hope everyone will vote for the normal monthly votes for "Ruzi Emperor". I won't have the monthly red envelopes, but I would like to thank readers who have already red envelopes this month (sorted by time):

Takahashi Zhuli, hello Ansheng, the heart of the falcon, not the left bank youth, Ling Xiaoxuan, Nalan Yanlin, 1yi76821, Zhouying, octopus wearing shoes, wood love rabbit, 13官网, ooiut, Dajue sword, q Pilu, lazy Pan, Gana Shenhua, have you brought an umbrella, call me Xiaoguang, attack the earth and the sky, eight scenes purple air, douteu color, fate is destined, Wei Wei, Duan Yuhen, Feng Xiaoxi 628, Little Potato Book Friend, Inaction is forbidden, Private 11官网, 1yrab t 14, Nalan Langyue, I am not foolish 1, I am not flower, humidity sensor, blood darkness, cold wind sweeps fallen leaves 2zj6338, autumn heart moon white, hny, feed, mental hospital?, Three Kingdoms color 第, lychee fried shrimp, book friend 2716346, sea will surely succeed, perfect fantasy, 11, the blade of crazy evil, idle and pain, summer Xuan and blank, 六第~_~, exciting e321, three disasters and nine disasters, thousands of mountains and rain, strangers, flying all over the sky, star ~ star ~ star, Wuji small fish.

Not so pure self-debate

Generally speaking, all walks of life have their own set of rhetoric to resist the doubts of laymen.

Scientists will say: Have you received professional training?

Politicians will say: Do you understand what the overall situation is?

The athlete will say: How much sweat have you shed?

The craftsman will say: Have you done it? How many years have you done it?

The businessman will say: How much money have you made? How much assets have you made?

The doctor will say: I will give you some Latin nouns, do you understand?

The old man and the aunt would say: The bridge I walked over is longer than the road you walked over.

...

Of course, the author also has a set of rhetoric. In the face of all doubts, he can reject it in one sentence: Do you know what a reasonable imagination is?

The most powerful statement is common in all walks of life: You can do it.

When using industry clichés to refute doubts, it is a bit perfunctory, but it is still a little serious. When saying "you can do it, you can get it", it usually has a little scoundrel.

The scoundrels are invincible, and the invincible is lonely, so there are not many scoundrels.

I don’t want to be a rogue, and I also hope that I can be more serious when facing doubts, so in addition to the answer to "reasonable imagination", I have to say a few more words.

First of all, I am not a historian, nor do I study history, and I don’t even have a good amateur level. I have never had such ambitions. I have read a lot of historical works and are more interested in the stories in it. When I encounter things like anime and aphorism, I will not read them all, and I will not read them in the analysis of long-term discussions.

So, some people questioned historical issues, and I had nothing to say, but I wouldn't change it because I couldn't.

History hopes to respect details, but only wants to make history interesting.

My suggestion is that everyone will go their own way. Since many historians can learn from the techniques of writing history, it should be fine if the author steals a few paragraphs of history?

What's more, the more unrecognizable the history in this world, wouldn't it prove the professionalism of history itself? If I can faithfully restore the original appearance of history in one piece, then shouldn't the history majors in universities be incorporated into the School of Literature?

I believe that no one will regard the wisdom of readers as real history. After reading it, you will feel something, which is the greatest praise to the author. If this feeling is slightly similar to when reading historical works, it can only prove the emotional commonality of human beings, rather than replacing history.

Secondly, people often say "unreasonable", and my answer is: the possibility of history has never been fully reflected.

Of course, this is the author's view and does not have any historical professionalism.

Let’s give a few examples.

In the thousands of years of history of Xia, Shang, Zhou and Qin, China was a typical aristocratic system. Suddenly, a commoner Liu Bang became the emperor. It seemed normal now. How incredible it was to be? Just going back ten years ago, even the saints could not have imagined that such a earth-shaking life would be.

Even compared with the history of the entire world, which region has there ever been such a large number of civilian emperors?

When Wang Mang usurped the throne, he was so cautious, like walking on ice. People in the world once thought that the country could only belong to the Liu family. However, from the Three Kingdoms to the end of the Southern and Northern Dynasties, usurping the throne became commonplace, and the emperor changed like a lantern. When "not the Liu family is not king", how many people could have expected this?

Wu Zetian became emperor, Zhu Yuanzhang expelled the Mongols, the Qing Dynasty entered the pass, and the great powers invaded... Every thing was an unprecedented strange thing. The predecessors could not have expected it to break their heads, but later generations saw the "necessity".

But I do not pursue that kind of "necessity". As my personal creative experience, chance is the foundation: Emperor Wu of Han's Battle of Mayi City failed only because of the leak of a minor official; Huo Guang was called a loyal minister, but his wife was extremely vulgar and even poisoned the queen to death; from the Eastern Han Dynasty to the end of the Three Kingdoms, countless generals died at the hands of assassins, and the four words "make guest assassination" frequently appeared, which was amazing what happened in that era, which made assassins popular?

As for title, Cixi liked "Lao Buddha". An emperor of the Ming Dynasty liked to be called "Master", like an ordinary rich man... The emperor's ** is no different from ordinary people. Those magnanimity and majesty are artificial illusions. When they are broken, there will never be any such thing as heavenly punishment. If it is broken, it will be broken. If the dynasty changes, it will start from a new beginning.

After all, I will go back to the four words "reasonable imagination". Be more modest, and remove the two words "reasonable". This is all my "imagination". In my imaginary world, the child is destined to have a bumpy journey, but he will continue to walk on it because the world has never promised anyone or any country smoothly. Instead of fantasizing about the smooth sailing, I would rather see my protagonist become stronger.

Finally, I would like to thank all readers. Taking advantage of the opportunity to defend myself, my ultimate goal is to thank the support.

After all, doubts are only a few, and many doubters also like this book. Please continue to question. Self-discrimination is thinking. Thinking has more possibilities, and more possibilities means a broader world.

Thank you. (To be continued.)8
Chapter completed!