490. The director is really not a coward
Chen Helin originally wrote a review titled "The movie is not bad, but the director is really timid!", but Chen Nannan persuaded him to withdraw.
"Grandpa, do you think the director is really scared?" Chen Nannan asked looking at his grandpa.
"Isn't it?" Although Chen Helin was stubborn, it depends on who refuted him.
Chen Nannan is naturally an exception, and he is still very willing to listen to his baby granddaughter's ideas.
"I am not a medicine god, is it considered to face the real problem directly?" Chen Nannan asked.
Chen Helin pondered for a moment and nodded and said, "That's right, but it's undeniable that the director has put a lot of things in this movie, right? So, I think he's timid and has something wrong with it?"
"And, do you think there is no problem with the starting point of the movie itself? It is unfair to point the finger at drug R&D manufacturers because of the high price of this type of targeted drugs. Drug R&D requires huge investment and long time cost investment. Just imagine if no one develops drugs, how can generic drugs start from imitation? For patients, they can only wait to die. So, the movie does not talk about the key points at all, right?"
Chen Nannan shook his head and said, "I don't think so. At least the director has a commendable courage. Everyone knows that this problem is definitely not just a problem for drug research and development manufacturers. However, if he really dares to point the finger at what he should be, the movie will not be released, so it is unrealistic to want to change reality through movies."
Chen Helin smiled. He was very pleased that he had such a view and such thoughts about his granddaughter, at least not following the crowd.
However, this still cannot change his view.
"I wrote a film review, not anything else, so the director is timid, you should admit it, right?" Chen Helin said with a smile.
"But don't you think this is a great progress? I think you are so scared. If you go to film a movie, do you think that if you really point the finger at the point, can the movie be released? I think the director should have made great efforts to make it. Grandpa, you are like this, aren't you going to be a bit unfair? Do you have to point out the real things and then be banned? You are not afraid? You are truly brave? That's not brave, that's a fool, that's a stubborn one, that's not brave, but not brave, but not flexible. If you make such a movie and make a movie that is banned one, the audience can't see it at all. What's the point?" Chen Nannan said excitedly.
She felt why grandpa was the same as the directors of the banned movies before.
Chen Helin's hearty laughter came again. He looked at Chen Nannan's angry look, stopped laughing, and nodded, "What you said is not unreasonable, forget it, let's write it like this, how about you? This time, grandpa's name will be lent to you for use?"
Chen Nannan's eyes lit up and she stepped forward to hold her grandfather's arm and said, "It's really good? I'll write it casually? In the name of my grandfather?"
Chen Helin nodded and said, "Of course, grandpa will read it too. If it cannot meet grandpa's requirements, I will not let you post it."
Chen Nannan said confidently: "Grandpa, don't worry."
Then, Chen Nannan quickly took out a written review.
"You little clever, have you prepared it long ago?" Chen Helin couldn't help but be amused by his granddaughter.
"Hehe! Grandpa, please take a look, can you see?" Chen Nannan looked at grandpa with anticipation.
Chen Helin nodded and said, "Then let me see, my dear granddaughter, how is it written."
First of all, the title: I am not a medicine god. Morality and law are inconsistent and misaligned!
Chen Helin nodded and said, "This is a good topic."
Chen Nannan smiled and said nothing, signaling grandpa to see quickly.
"I remember that there was such a conversation between a mother and daughter in the next seat in the theater.
The little girl asked softly: "Mom, is he a good person or a bad person?"
The little girl's mother replied softly: "He is a good person."
The little girl asked again: "Why did the police arrest him?"
The little girl's mother obviously didn't think about how to answer.
The above conversation happened when Cheng Yong's head was pressed to the ground by the police.
In literary works, there is often a vague sense of chaos that makes people sigh. This sense of chaos makes people unable to separate right and wrong, thereby arousing the audience's thinking and resonance. I am used to calling this sense of chaos "misplacement". The film is not among the God of Medicine, but between the law and morality, and between the kindness and the vigilant atmosphere of human nature. At the moment when the entertainment atmosphere is getting stronger and stronger, this is a rare film with attitude. It is not a comedy, but a drama.
This question has been thinking for a long time. How should I answer it?
The misalignment between morality and law, the boundary between good and bad, and the distinction between good and evil.
Cheng Yong is undoubtedly a "bad person" in law. Because he violated the law, there is nothing wrong with this, but he did good morals, so he is a "good person" in morals.
It is precisely the existence of characters like "Cheng Yong" that narrows the dislocation between morality and law. Morality is the standard for people to measure all behaviors, and law is only a mandatory moral guarantee, which is also the reason why "Cheng Yong" violates the law and is still respected by people.
So if it were me, I would answer: He did good deeds, so he was a good person. But his approach was not right and he violated the law at that time, so he would be arrested by the police. But you see, although the police arrested him, they still respected him. The police car drove slowly, and there were many people who saw him off on the roadside, which respected him. So, we should also be respectful in the future, and do our best to do things with our own conscience. Of course, we should not violate the law. We should use the right method to do good deeds.
At the end of the movie, the court sentenced the defendant Cheng Yong to five years in prison.
From a legal perspective, this judgment is flawed. Cheng Yong was sentenced, but he did not uphold the legal system, but slapped the legislation in the face. So many people, those who cannot afford medicine, were indirectly sentenced to death. Should they die? The losses caused by such sentences are 500 people, or 2,000 people, or more. How many major casualties are there? Isn’t the casualties of so many people a major casualties? Does that judge feel unhappy? Maybe, but is this the original intention of legislation? Is so many people dead, whether it is enough, should the poor die?
Can you guarantee that you will not get sick, your family and relatives will not get sick? This is a spiritual question from the patient's old lady.
Chapter completed!