Although Kiana had eaten big chicken drumsticks fed by Ning Luo in the past, after meeting again and being helped to uncover the mystery of Ning Luo, and then tasting Ning Luo's feeding, she couldn't help but think: This

How come the big chicken drumsticks from this time are so delicious? Woohoo! I'm so happy. Brother Ningluo, a fool, actually made me wait for so long. It's too much! Quite too much! I have to bully him in the future.

She calls Ning Luo, but in Kiana's heart, Ning Luo has always been her Ning Luo brother. After the standard of appearance and aesthetics has been raised too high, she sees no obvious lily mentality in any girl.

The genes have changed.

Of course, if girls like Liu Shen and Meroklia, whose appearance and even image were modified by Ning Luo, showed their true appearance, Kiana still couldn't refuse. After all, her psychological structure was not perfect.

Off.

"Brother Ningluo, I want white hair and red eyes."

Meroklia suddenly demanded, she knew that Ning Luo came from Xuanming Kingdom.

After thinking about it, Ning Luo agreed. Occasionally changing the image and template would make the borrowed template a public component. This is a good idea. Constantly change the template and image of the so-called plagiarized character according to your heart.

From borrowing a template to mentioning a template, it further debunks the claim of plagiarism.

In short, in one sentence, Ning Luo didn't think that the author was afraid of being accused of plagiarism, but that those who said that his own author plagiarized were really disgusting. He was sure that his own author did not regard the public content as the content of the novel at all.

The content is not plagiarized. All aspects have been modified to the extent that the original work can be ignored, and it is a serious customization. There is no magic modification at all. He thought the author mentioned some sensitive words!

Writing Ning Luo's novel blurs the boundary between fantasy and reality in terms of setting. Moreover, in terms of the definition of this novel, the original work is not the original work, and the fans are not fans. It is forced to define plagiarism from the original work in reality.

, you are just playing hooligan, can’t the flow of virtual reality become a genre?

Just say it!

You say it is plagiarism legally, but you have to define the scope of plagiarism.

It breaks away from the legal definition of plagiarism, and does not take the so-called plagiarized elements as the theme, but turns them into 'so', 'because', 'Ultraman', 'First Emperor', 'Immortal Emperor', and 'Immortal King'

, 'Great Emperor', 'lyric name', 'book title', 'brand name' and other common components, plagiarism! Haha!

Damn! It’s so tiring to speak for your own author!

According to the laws on Blue Star, this is not called plagiarism by Ning Luo.

According to the laws of a certain type of earth, in the author's time, there was no law that clearly defined "plagiarism". Plagiarism and plagiarism as mentioned in copyright law refer to stealing other people's works or fragments of works as one's own.

Yes.

Plagiarizing other people’s work?

All contents of this novel are original in conception and innovation.

The name of the person does not belong to the fragment, and no redundant name is used to present the original work to increase the popularity. There is still a difference between using and rubbing.

The image, in the definition of this novel, is higher than that of the original work.

Plagiarizing the original template? It’s just one side of the novel’s template.

In fact, his author loves the new and dislikes the old templates, and likes to modify them. From the reader's perspective, he does not even make the so-called original templates clear and get an unknown two-thirds of the attention, and the use value is not worthy of plagiarism.

First, is the behavior illegal?

Only when it is defined as plagiarism can it be considered illegal.

Second, is there any objective fact of damage?

Not to mention that in this novel, all the original works are used as the bones, and some of the names of people or the names of the other side of the world world are used as the ink.

Then, where it is said to be plagiarized, can you explain why?

Because even if it uses the names of people and is defined as a fragment, and also includes the description of the scene that only uses some place names and power names without the original description,... you also forcefully define it as a fragment, then the key to the original fragment is not the content.

What about the plot, tsk tsk! Who the hell just followed the original work!

Therefore, the content, plot and even character templates and images are at least 99% different from the original work. What fragments did my author plagiarize?

If the clips are not plagiarized, then there is no possibility of plagiarizing the work.

Third, is there a causal relationship with the fact of damage?

First of all, the definition and setting of this novel are based on the Mist Era, a world view that transcends ordinary imagination or contemporary imagination, as the absolute background. The way it is written can depict any reality at will.

The so-called damage to the facts, for Ning Luo in the novel, not to mention the fact that the writing is not based on the original work. Plagiarized fragments and plagiarized works cannot be defined, let alone the vague statement that it is damaging the facts.

.

If it is disgusting to say that it is damaging to the facts, it is just a competition on the same stage with the fictitious original work. It can be explained as follows:

As a restaurant owner, you are allowed to develop new dishes, but I am not allowed to hack your dishes and use sublimated versions to compete with you?

Anyone who opens a restaurant is not considered plagiarizing recipe patents. They sublimate and revise novel materials, and then create original novels in terms of form, content, and genre. They also use the framework of the novel setting to connect fiction and reality and non-original settings to create diversity.

And the creation of richness and novelty is nothing but plagiarism.

Fourth, is the perpetrator at fault?

Since plagiarism needs to be published to produce infringement consequences, that is, there is objective fact of damage, so when plagiarism is determined, it usually refers to published plagiarism.

Ning Luo said that my author has indeed published his work.

However, in legal terms, a more accurate statement is that plagiarism refers to stealing other people's works or fragments of works as one's own and publishing them as one's own, when plagiarism has not been defined previously.

When you talk about plagiarism, you have reason to think you are being a hooligan!

Huh? So what if I’m just being a hooligan?

When your actions and words can give many people this view! Even if you force it to be plagiarism, then the law cannot be defined as plagiarism by a gangster!

This chapter is not over yet, please click on the next page to continue reading!

There is nothing wrong with obeying the law, but when the law is wrong and there is no time to correct the error, and many people can see that the law is wrong, it is definitely not in line with public opinion to make and implement unreasonable legal judgments.

Anyway, Ning Luo has already decided.

If his author is subjected to unreasonable legal judgments and executions, even he who can be called absolute providence will still be angry!

Of course, Ning Luo announced here that if his author is really judged to have plagiarized, then he will have to explain one fact about the content of this chapter of the novel:

This is not called angry politics, but expressing one's own public opinion.

It’s always right to talk about what you think is the unreasonableness of the law!

Besides, Ning Luo can definitely say that his author is responsible.

As for, saying that his author is right?

Haha! Is right and wrong determined by rationality, or by people who distort the meaning of the law?

If the copyright law itself is not violated, whether another author plagiarizes depends on whether the judge and law enforcer are fair.

If it is unfair, then there is no need for other authors to write it.

For Ning Luo, his author's purpose is to make money, not profit, just like people can eat pandas in an emergency, but eating pandas is illegal according to law, making money and profit

The same is true for the difference. If you cannot make a profit, but you make a profit, and you are willing to quit, then the legal definition is just making money, not profit-seeking.

It's impossible, the law will be so rigid that the disgusting guy can twist it!
Chapter completed!