Chapter 485 Detective Chuck, thank you for ruining your undefeated myth with your honesty!

Author: Qingsi Looking Back

Chapter 485 Detective Chuck, thank you for ruining your undefeated myth with your honesty!

"He's looking at you."

"I don't like this look."

Monica and the others accompanied Chuck to observe the trial of the case, and naturally saw the look in the defendant's eyes.

"Don't worry about him."

Chuck said expressionlessly.

"Are you really going to give Phoebe's request a second thought?"

Rachel was not very interested in this kind of thing and immediately couldn't help but look at Chuck gossiping.

"I'm not Alexandre Dumas."

Chuck said bluntly.

"hehe!"

Rachel thought of Chuck's long-term scientific research strategic partners, which she could hardly count with two hands. She was a little hesitant about this, but she was still very happy.

how to say.

Anyway, she got in the car first.

Of course, we hope to seal the car door as tightly as possible to prevent others from squeezing in.

"Phoebe can't even resign?"

Monica is a little more generous than Rachel. Anyway, she has accepted so much. Even Rachel was pushed into the car from behind by her. Daofei is really not much better than one.

And even though Phoebe's confessional scene last night was all about acting, it's undeniable that there was definitely emotion involved.

Of the three sisters, Phoebe was the only one left out. If it were her, she wouldn't be able to bear it and would want to get in the car together.

So last night, after chatting all night at best friend's night, she promised Phoebe to help.

Monica knew that Chuck was going to appear in court today, so she came here with Rachel. Before entering the court, they told Chuck directly about this matter.

But unexpectedly and within reason, Chuck refused.

The reason is not that Phoebe's looks and figure are not enough for scientific research.

Think about it too.

Although Phoebe has an eccentric character, she is beautiful and has a good figure. She is the tallest among the three of them. She also likes to dress herself up and has various hairstyles.

The twin sister Ursula, who has the same appearance as her, is able to act in small movies and become famous, and is considered by various LSPs, which shows that her basic score is very high.

The reason for rejection was not basic points. She also introduced some requirements of long-term strategic partners to Phoebe, and Phoebe did not refuse. She only said: "If you can do it, I can do it too."

The meaning behind the words is that if we all work together, if you persist to the end, I can do the same.

Whenever you want to dodge, she will dodge too.

But when even she thought it was about the same, the reason Chuck gave for rejection was precisely Phoebe's work and living habits.

This made her realize.

Phoebe works as a masseur, and she comes into contact with so many strangers every day, which is a very intimate kind of thing.

Phoebe's living habits are also very bad. It would be fine if she didn't have mysophobia. If she can meet the standards of ordinary people like Rachel, as long as she helps, there will be no problem.

But Phoebe was so unhygienic that she even kept rats in the apartment.

Take a peek and see the whole leopard.

How could Chuck, a severe mysophobia patient, agree to sign Phoebe as a long-term strategic research partner?

Not even one-time ones.

"A country is easy to change, but a person's nature is hard to change."

Chuck shook his head and refused.

It is easy to change Phoebe's job, but it is impossible to change her living habits and attitude that are seriously inconsistent with Chuck's.

"All right."

Monica smiled bitterly.

She knew it was impossible for Chuck to agree.

In fact, she wasn't very optimistic about Rachel at first. Without Ross's added help and push from behind, Rachel would have no chance no matter how sweet she looked.

And Phoebe doesn't have Ross's bonus and assistance. It's impossible for Chuck to lower the standard, and the gap is too big. Even if Chuck is willing to lower the standard, Phoebe can't meet it.

After all, Chuck is not a libertine like Barney Stinson, and having the same face as a minor movie star is not a huge bonus.

She no longer knew how to face Phoebe and tell her the bad news.

Just thinking about this gave her a headache.

For a long time in the future, they will most likely have to face Phoebe's "pity". The intensity of this reference will definitely exceed the frequency of Phoebe citing tragic experiences such as her mother's suicide in childhood.

Just as they were telling lies about Phoebe, Executive Assistant Prosecutor Ben Stone asked Chuck to testify in court as an expert witness.

Chuck got up and went to the witness stand.

The executive assistant prosecutor followed the video analysis process provided by Chuck and repeated it in front of the judge and jury in court in the form of questioning.

Chuck's miraculousness naturally attracted everyone's attention again.

When Executive Assistant Prosecutor Ben Stone ended his questioning, the defense attorney stood up and walked to the witness stand and asked: "Dr. Wolfe, you proposed a plea bargain when you first met my client.

Let my client accept the charge of first-degree manslaughter, right?"

"right."

Chuck said expressionlessly on the witness stand.

"For first-degree manslaughter, four years to 12 years. You said you would ask the executive assistant prosecutor to recommend a minimum sentencing of four years, and you also said this was the best choice."

The defense lawyer looked around the jury: "Because this is New York, it's impossible to acquit, right?"

"right."

Chuck had no intention of denying it.

"But at that time, you supported my client in counterattacking and killing two armed robbers, right?"

The defense lawyer continued to ask.

"That's right."

Chuck still nodded.

"You also have impressive insights into legal immigration and illegal immigration, as well as the eclectic thinking of juries."

The defense lawyer took a deep look at Chuck. It was strange that Chuck didn't hide it at all and admitted it so straightforwardly. However, this did not prevent him from pursuing the victory, because after he repeated what Chuck said at that time, it was no surprise that

There was an uproar in the court.

Both the judge and the jury looked unhappy.

Because this kind of truth is usually impossible for anyone to dare to tell.

The compromising thoughts of the jury are, at best, to avoid an unjust, false and wrongful conviction, and at worst, to avoid responsibility. They are the snowflakes of "no snowflake in an avalanche is innocent" that has led to the increasing crime rate in New York.

People often hate some people sometimes because they see shortcomings in these people that they are unwilling to admit.

And naturally I hate people who are overly honest and unwilling to admit their shortcomings exposed in public!

"So before you supported my client as a hero and wanted to help him, why did you change your mind? Is it because my client rejected your kindness and you became angry?"

"be opposed to!"

Executive Assistant Prosecutor Ben Stone immediately stood up and objected: "Purely personal speculation!"

"Objection valid."

The judge glanced at Chuck and signaled the defense lawyer to pay attention to his words.

"All right."

The defense lawyer smiled and signaled that he would not ask this question again. He took a few steps to adjust his emotions and continued to ask: "Based on your expert opinion, how will the jury decide this time?"

When Executive Assistant Prosecutor Ben Stone wanted to object loudly again, he already laughed and made amends: "I voluntarily withdraw the question."

As he spoke, he spread his hands and returned to his seat.

It is said that the question is being withdrawn voluntarily, but as soon as such a question is asked, its fatal influence has already been transmitted.

Everyone, especially the jury, has received the information and cannot help but think about a question: "Detective Chuck was sure that our jury would compromise and turn the two murder charges into one innocent and one guilty, so how does he do it now?"

It’s up to us? How should we judge?”

Without this public 'withdrawal' issue, and the defense lawyer's previous disclosure of Chuck's judgment on this case, both the judge and themselves would have already had an idea.
To be continued...