Unfortunately, Ray Allen's ball seemed to have provoked the Lakers' No. 24. As soon as the next ball passed half court, he took the shot half a meter away from the three-point line. McGrady was caught off guard and hit the net with a three-pointer.

And turning around, Kobe and "Magic" Johnson substituted each other, and the Lakers began to stare at Stephen Curry with all their strength on the 24th!

In this change of formation on the field, "Zen Master" did not interfere much, because in his opinion, it was the right thing to do.

Although Ray Allen is also a three-point shooter and a big-hearted player, he is not on the same level as the Warriors' No. 30. The Warriors' No. 30 is a comprehensively enhanced version of the former. Perhaps in addition to physical fitness and shooting skills,

The latter has entered a field that no one has ever touched. "Zen Master" looks at people very viciously, so Kobe took the initiative to switch defense, and he nodded secretly.

Kobe was a defensive monster at his peak, which was completely different from his state after 2010.

Let's put it this way, the same is the first defense, and there is a distinction between strength and weakness. A 95-point first defense and an 80-point first defense may seem to have the same honors, but the scene effects are completely different. Kobe Bryant at his peak was guarding Ku.

Here, Curry suddenly became a little misfired. Facing the elderly Kobe Bryant who had torn his Achilles tendon, he couldn't completely get rid of him one-on-one. He could only force Yan Yu to shoot. Now this is the peak No. 24, what is he doing?

This is still the case without Hand-g. If there were, Curry would probably suffer again.

It's not that No. 24 can completely guard against the "super god" Curry, but with restrictions, there is definitely no problem.

Because Curry left the Warriors system and only played in isolation, he was not ranked among the quasi-super giants.

This is not to belittle Curry, but he is a player without the ball and shooting. Singles is not his strongest point and he cannot fully display his true strength. Tang Qian will see his true ability in the future.

Suddenly, the Tang Qian team's outside attack was faintly contained again. If they score 2 points, the opponent can also score on the offensive end. If they go back and forth, the time will be over long ago. The legendary Lakers can afford it.

But Tang Qian's team obviously couldn't afford to delay them.

The game time is very unfavorable for them.

"Zen Master" Jackson's face slowly showed a smile of victory. He believed that he would definitely win this game.

Yes, with Lakers No. 29 here, Tang Qian basically can't attack the basket in the penalty area, but... what is the triangle offense? Where is the essence? We can't create one-on-one singles opportunities on the inside, and we can't create one-on-one opportunities on the outside.

sure.

No matter how strong you are on the 29th, you are only one person. As long as we launch a one-on-one triangle outside the penalty area, what can you do to me?

As for the triangle offense, it can be used with the inside line and is also compatible with the outside line.

Otherwise, neither Choko nor O'Neal are players in the same position, so why would the triangle offense still run unimpeded? This is the reason why the "Zen Master" has been as stable as a rock until now.

The legendary Lakers are really good on the outside. No. 24 Kobe stepped forward again and scored consecutive high-post shots. It can be seen that Kobe is far more reliable than "Baylor" on key balls. Regardless of whether you look at the data or not, it is the same.

The fact is, it is definitely not the same as the past. Elgin Baylor's career shooting percentage is only 43%, which is already good, but he is still much weaker than Kobe.

Kobe's shooting percentage is around 45%. In fact, he has always been very good on the back line. Especially before the rise of efficient play, Kobe's corrected shooting percentage, true shooting rate, and basic shooting rate were all the best on the back line.

But if you want to compare him with forward players, of course they can't compare. Comparing hits across positions is not a comparable thing at all.

It is obvious that the back line is not as good as the forward line, and the forward line is not as good as the inside line. It is as strong as Qiao Shen, the first man in history, and has no ability to break this shackles. So look at the four major points and some of the previous outside scoring champions, and you will

You know, the 45% shooting rate is not as bad as you think. Furthermore, the shooting rate is affected by many factors, such as the way of the game, the rhythm of the game, teammates around you, the style of play of the era, shot distance, shot selection,

Pot catch rate, etc., there are countless. To convert, it is the difference between 10 out of 20 and 9 out of 20 in a game. You can say that 2 points determines many things, but the above factors must also be considered.

Iverson is always criticized for his shooting percentage. Is it really an inefficient breakup? The year he entered the finals, he took 30 shots to score 32+ points, and his shooting rate was only about 38%. But if you think about it, without him

, could the 76ers make it to the Finals that year?

The hit rate thing is actually just a reference value. Of course it is useful, but if you treat it as a "bible", you will ultimately only regard yourself as a "nerve". Because many things cannot be quantified by data.

This famous shooting percentage argument, in fact, after James' 14-15 season, few people "raise it high".

The most efficient star in the league once boasted that he could definitely score 60 points in 37 shots. After James scored 61 points in 33 shots that year, he was immediately regarded as a "standard" and continued to exaggerate. But the fact is,

The sample of one game is too small. It is true that King James exploded in that game, but it is almost certain that he has entered the "Super God" and is not an ordinary "Super God", so he did this. One sample is too many

, immediately reveal the true situation.

The 2014-15 Finals was a year when James really started firing, but the fact is that he only scored 35.8 points in 32.7 shots.

This is actually a very strong statistic. It’s okay if the hit rate is less than 40%. But from this point of view, if you really give a person 30+ shots, he will definitely be able to average more than 40+ per game. That’s just a dream. This

It's still just one round of the series. Over the course of a whole season, the sample size will be larger and it will be more difficult to maintain stability. Therefore, when Tang Qian plays basketball, he always regards the so-called hit rate as a reference, authority, and standard.

He can't do it.

Because many realities told him that this was simply impossible.

Playing basketball, especially professional basketball, is always about performance on the court, which trumps everything else.

In one game, XXX scored 30 points with a low shooting percentage, but every shot was hard and key. In a game, XXX also scored 30 points with a high shooting percentage, but it was insignificant garbage time.

, will you be deceived if you look at the data after the game? So, the data can actually lie. The more games you watch, the more you will feel this way.

ESPN has hyped up the so-called "big data theory" in the NBA, but don't forget that they are always just media people and never true insiders.

Listening to a group of outsiders commenting on insiders is originally a bit "hype" and "ridiculous".

It's just that the NBA is a business league, so it needs to deal with these media people. There is no way.

There is no problem with data refinement, and it is even a good thing to promote the development of basketball. But everything is based on data. Well, this is the impact that ESPN wants to have on you after it implements "big data theory".

"Magic's" career PER is only 18th in history, not as good as Barkley, Robinson, or even Towns and Anthony Davis. Is this his strength? You must know that "Magic" is definitely among the top five in NBA history.

Man, he retired because of AIDS at the peak of his career. Logically speaking, there is no such thing as holding him back at the end. This is what he has. Yao Ming’s career PER ranks 25th in history. Is he better than Nowitzki and Garnett?

Is he a better player? Even though he is Yao Mi, he can't say this. There are many similar things. Olajuwon, the number one center in the 1990s, also ranked outside the 20th in career PER and has never touched the Western Conference.

Paul, who dominates the floor, is the master of this list, occupying the top seven positions for a long time.

Let me use the exact words of Steve Kerr, the head coach of the 2016-2017 Warriors after they won the championship: First of all, I don’t like the PER data. I think it is a statistic with many flaws. Of course, I don’t know how.

Let’s improve this data model. For example, when I first came to the Bay Area, Green’s PER was very low, even much lower than David Lee. But later everyone knew that David was a very comprehensive All-Star.

player, but his impact on the game is far less than Green. But just looking at this PER, you will think, oh, how is this thing calculated?

This paragraph is the original words of host LOWE when he interviewed Cole after he won the championship. Even the head coach does not trust something (not to mention that the head coach is not an expert), but the fans were stunned by the media people. This is ESPN

Promotional success, or another kind of basketball tragedy?

Brush~

Kobe Bryant scored consecutively, and Tang Qian's team could not close the score difference. And this is what "Zen Master" Jackson wanted.

As long as it drags on, victory can be guaranteed.

Tang Qian is anxious, but he cannot make more contributions on the offensive end. His current strength is on the defensive end.

On the offensive end, he could only do nothing and be helpless.

But now there is a problem. On the Tang Qian team, no one can handle No. 24, and no one can defend No. 24, so the score cannot be reduced at all. There is no way, what will you do if they don't play inside? You Tang Qian, go out?

The accurate basketball was slung back into the paint.

The game entered 1 minute, but the Tang Qian team was still 6 points behind its opponent.

Tang Qian originally wanted to give it a try, but at this time, Kobe Bryant, who was at his peak, poured cold water on him and his team.

No, it's not cold water, it's ice water.

With a "swipe" sound, the top-curving three-pointer forced McGrady into the net.

PS: Cole’s interview about PER data is true and correct, not made up by Xiaozi. In fact, the founder of this data model, ESPN’s data expert and current Grizzlies executive John Hollinger himself once said this

Xiao Zi will post the English version of the original text on the shortcomings and defects of the model system to the book club. If you are interested, you can take a look for yourself. I say this not to prove how bad PER is, but just to restore the best way to watch football.

As it is, if the greatness of outstanding players is measured solely by data models, it will definitely end up being "disputed" and boring.

I especially miss the atmosphere of watching football in those days. What everyone discussed most was the performance on the court, instead of pretending to be an expert and throwing out a lot of data. Xiao Zi personally believes that the data is only a reference, the key is to watch the game.

That's it. Cold statistics can never replace a truly exciting and passionate real game.

Don’t worry about the rest of the plot, Xiao Zi said that a complete outline has been drawn up long ago, and there will be no overwriting.
Chapter completed!