After the comic exhibition, the first platforms such as Yahoo Community and Facebook were popular.

Especially those who have experienced it personally can't help but share their joy online, "...I said it so well, one cycle after another, Marvel is going to take a different path, looking forward to "Avengers".

"What is the owner talking about? I can't understand it. Also, is "Avengers" a new movie from Marvel?"

"I asked together whether something happened that we didn't know."

After a series of question marks below, another participant appeared and explained: "This is what happened yesterday in the Golden State Comic Exhibition. Marvel made a big move and also dissed the DC next door, announcing the news that "Avengers" will be launched soon. Then it also said that from "Iron Man 1", "Invincible Hulk", "Thor", "Captain America" ​​and "Iron Man 2", the narratives in this series are mutually influential and interdependent. Marvel has unified these stories into a chapter called "Infinite Legend".

"WTF? The more I say it, the less I can't understand it. However, the Easter eggs and foreshadowing of Marvel's works are quite coherent. Is this a unified phased narrative?"

"Marvel is amazing. The idea of ​​installing a framework is even more powerful. Is this the so-called redefinition?"

"I just want to know who the black shadow that Thor spoke to Loki at the end, and what was the scepter he gave him?"

"The concept of the Avengers is found in comics, but if it is made into a movie, it is obviously necessary to make adjustments. The timeline is different. I hope Marvel can make a good change."

———

“MCU?”

Nasim, the global executive who was lying on the boss' chair to listen to the report, sat upright and sighed secretly: "I didn't expect that Marvel also has people who understand it. It's a pity, it's a pity, how can you solve the problem of too scattered scenes..."

"Okay, I get it, go out."

Obviously, Nasim does not think Marvel's MCU plan will be successful.

After all, the one who first thought about related development and took action was Global.

Do you still remember the movie "Van Helsing" that starring Hugh Jackman didn't want to mention? According to the initial planning of Universal, the benefits of their arrangements are obvious and genius ideas-

One of the typical elements of a movie is content creation, and its content production cost is quite high, unpredictable, and the risk is still high. If you accidentally invest, you will be wasted.

You should know that a movie with an investment of over 100 million may have a box office of over 10 billion, and a naked huge profit may be less than 10 million, and it will lose until the underwear is left. The gap between the movie is always carefully considered for film companies. Moreover, it is difficult to completely copy the success of a movie. Even if it is the same series, this movie will be sold at the top, and the next movie may have a crushing box office defeat.

In other words, every movie can be regarded as an independent event, and every movie has to start over.

How did "Van Helsing" be done? Global's conception also uses a series mode to pull many once popular and later silent screen images with a main line, giving them new value.

This is the meaning of content filling. Even if "Van Helsing" fails due to excessive cost, as long as the movie fans like it, they can create benefits with the classic images such as Frankenstein, werewolf, vampires, etc. that appear in it. If "Van Helsing" sells well at the box office, the copyrights of other characters are more likely to be successful, because their plots are interrelated and integrated, which goes beyond the flaws of independent movies, and each character can also become a carrier for attracting fans.

Then, as we all know, "Van Helsing" was defeated, there were too many characters, and the unorganized embarrassing plot direction also led to criticism from a large number of viewers.

What Nassim said is also due to the idea of ​​Marvel and the former Universal Universal, using the connection between characters to expand the audience carrier, but there are only difficulties and there will be no good results...

———

"It sounds very good and has a good idea, but there is no specific result to testify. Let's take a look and see how this game is playing."

Columbia's boss Michael Linton held a manuscript detailing the "MCU" plan and said to Carlos, general manager of the production department: "However, the development of the first few projects on Marvel was quite smooth. Even if it was screwed up, it would not affect the value of the original character already developed."

"Last night, Lehman called me to discuss the return of Spider-Kid." Carlos said with some temptation: "They are constantly showing their support now, and we may also use Marvel's popularity to increase the value of Spider-Kid. Just as the president said, Marvel has become a climate, and it may not be impossible to win-win, each of them will get what they need."

"Look at it again." Michael Linton refused. He still had the idea of ​​independent development in his heart and got a piece of cake. Moreover, Spider's copyright business involves a variety of people, not only the production department, the distribution department, but also the animation department, and even the parent company Sony. This decision is not easy. Once it is not done well, his position will be unstable. If he really waits for a day to rely on external stimulation, there will definitely be other people who have to come forward and have to change.

After all, Marvel is not strong enough to make people look at it. I can only say that it is indeed doing well. Lehman and Kevin are both capable and ideas leaders.

———

"Hmph, I just succeeded a few times by chance."

Unlike other manufacturers, Warner CEO Kevin Tsujihara was angry and complained a little when she learned the news.

Yes, although Lehman did not explain it very carefully at the press conference, everyone understands who the so-called comic adaptation circle refers to - after shooting, refrigerated, and filming, there are no other examples except DC. After all, even the adaptation of Marvel sold the copyright is still a matter of the next thousand years.

So when the comic exhibition ended, the hot searches were the countless versions of Batman comparisons that DC had filmed before. Warner definitely didn't want this topic that was highlighted and attracted traffic, but this is a fact that it can't be denied.

Of course, Lehmann's wording is not too prejudiced. Although Warner was unhappy, he would not turn against him because of a sentence or two.

Similarly, Warner did not pay much attention to the planning of "MCU" and did not have proven achievements. For these major manufacturers, they were all false. They would only watch coldly, just like "Avatar" - even if "Avengers" succeeded, it would just hold a meeting to analyze and then copy the market concepts.

Think about it, "Avatar" has brought 3D+IMAX trend to Hollywood, and what "Avengers" can bring to Hollywood is still an unknown...
Chapter completed!