The comprehensive media review of "Interstellar" is officially released.

Bad review, one.

Most recent reviews, ten.

...

Full score, ten.

Good reviews, twenty-eight.

...

I won’t read the comment content for the time being. You can feel it simply from the data comparison that “Interstellar” continues the reputation trend during the internal preview. Under the ambiguous, ambiguous overall pattern, the positive reviews of Nolan and Renli still gain the upper hand. No matter what my personal opinion is, it is still undeniable that the completion of the work is still worthy of recognition.

After browsing the comment content carefully, you can gradually find that the main controversy among film critics is whether the "main theme of family affection" is enough: too dramatic? too petty? too bloody and sensational? Or is emotion a part of human nature? Returning to humanity itself is correct? The trigger points for discussion and reflection are already everywhere?

This is also the boundary between distinguishing between moderate reviews and positive reviews.

Putting aside the arguments at the core of the theme, in fact, forty-eight of the forty-nine media have reached many consensuses:

The visual effects are indeed magnificent, the space images are indeed amazing, the sound effects are indeed wonderful, and the actors' performances are indeed good... Overall, this is probably the case. Nolan once again showed his keen talent for cameras, pictures, editing and other aspects, and successfully completed a well-made work.

The only regret and the most interesting thing is that Nolan's shortcomings in tune/teaching actors are exposed again.

Heath Ledger, who was originally "Batman: The Dark Knight", relied entirely on the actor's own interpretation and interpretation. The role of Joker he played also became the first actor in history to win an Oscar for a superhero movie, but Nolan's contribution was really limited.

The same is true this time.

The entire theme of "Interstellar" is centered on emotions, which further highlights the importance of actors' performance. Unfortunately, Nolan does not have the ability to tune/teach acting skills, and ultimately can only rely on the actor's self-exercise to complete the role, which is also the reason why he relies on powerful casts.

Renly Hall, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, Michael Kane... This is a very powerful cast, with a total of 14 Oscar nominations and four Little Golden Man trophys. Their strength is unquestionable, but the reputation of the performance is slightly different. Some people praise it, and some people complain wildly. The main reason is that

Unable to be unified.

Each actor has his own performance style, but Nolan was unable to find the same rhythm and connect all the performances, which also made the final appearance unbalanced, especially the difference in performance power and rhythm, which often makes the characters' emotions rise and fall like a seesaw, and cannot form a unity. This further amplifies the drama of the emotions and leads to strong accusations of "soap opera".

The result is naturally that some people like and complain.

However, James Roche from the "playlist" will definitely not agree with other critics:

"Maybe 'Interstellar' is not perfect, but Renly Hall proves himself again."

"This is definitely not Christopher Nolan's best work, and it is still a good level to be better; but undoubtedly, this is an exploration of Christopher Nolan who jumped out of his own security field, trying to broaden his understanding and exploration of movies. The only reason why this exploration was successful was Renly Hall!"

"Hal Hall Hall! Renli Hall once again proved that he is one of the best actors in the present! Every look that appears on the big screen vividly interprets the changes in emotions. His performance gives the character real vitality. It is hard to imagine what the "Interstellar" would be without Renli Hall."

"I really don't want to continue to praise Renly Hall anymore. Those praises have made people's ears calendered and even started to get bored. But the fact is that Hall once again proves that he is irreplaceable among actors under the age of thirty. His delicate and profound performance truly interprets Othello's vastness."

"If in this world, if you choose an actor, sit in front of the camera and talk to yourself, it will be 90 minutes, and the audience must sit in place and watch it. My first choice will always be Renly Hall! Has anyone noticed a stop and a turn of Renly Hall in the opening stage? That's the story."

"The favorite paragraph of the whole film: Lanli Hall's eyes. In the most important twists of the whole movie, Lanli Hall's eyes became the finishing touch on the entire big screen, simple and profound, and it's full of strength when it hits it. To be honest, I couldn't think of a better word to describe him."

"It is able to surpass the cover of directors and special effects in a commercial film work, and to present a profound performance with sharp edges. The last time it appeared in Nolan's work, the actor was named Heath Ledger."

...

James Roche does not like Renly's performance, not because Renly's performance is disappointing, but because of the homogeneity of "interstellar travel" and "gravity". He expects Renly to break through himself; but obviously, James Roche's idea has not been recognized and supported by his peers.

Praise! Praise! Or praise! One after another, I can't stop. Even the media that gave the reviewers to the general reviews were not stingy with their praise. Considering that this is a commercial movie, it would be even more incredible. So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?

The haters are bound to think that this is another routine "business flattery". Perhaps Lan Li's performance is indeed good, but how can the focus of a commercial film be performance? It can be special effects, story, and protagonist charm, but... performance? Is this sure it's not a joke?

Supporters don’t care, because Lanli has proved her excellence through performances again and again. Previously, Lanli’s performance was highly praised in “Fast and Furious 5” and “Edge of Tomorrow”. So why can’t it be in “Interstellar”? Perhaps other actors’ performances in commercial movies have not been able to show their brilliance, but it does not mean that Lanli can’t do it either, let alone the case of “gravity” was not long ago.

This is a good thing, but also a bad thing.

But it is undeniable that the media comprehensive reviews have once again shown the unmoved firmness of professional film critics. Putting aside the negative remarks during the awards season, the affirmative views of film critics on "gravity" and "drunk folk songs" have never changed. This is also the strong support point for Lanli to win the Oscar nomination for the fourth consecutive year. Now, film critics are still relatively objective and give praise to Lanli.

After experiencing the trough of the awards season and the missed Oscars, people are more looking forward to the highly anticipated "explosive drummer" at the Sundance Film Festival, and are looking forward to this work becoming a shining moment for Lanli to show the charm of the actors; but who would have thought that "Interstellar" was the first to accomplish such a feat in the summer season, showing Lanli's strong control over the performance with the shell of a commercial film, and won applause again!

The recovery momentum is coming so quickly!

But if you think about it seriously, strictly speaking, Renli has never really fallen into a trough or falls into trouble, so there is no way to talk about the "recovery".

The praise and pursuit of "Interstellar" is more like the short-term bumps and bumps that were given again after the treatment that Lan Li deserved. This is a more appropriate statement. Compared to the recovery and rise, compared with the current status of Lan Li in the industry, the space for continuous "breakthrough" is really limited, and returning to its original position is enough.

From the confusion of bad reviews and middle reviews to the heat of good reviews, the "Interstellar" media comprehensive review made a brilliant debut under the attention of everyone. The comprehensive reviews of forty-nine media finally settled at 79 points. Unfortunately, they were unable to cross the 80s threshold and entered the "excellent" ranks. This is also the lowest work of the media comprehensive review since Ren Li's "transcendence".

But is the 79-point really too low? To be precise, it should be that the praise standard of Renli's works is too high. You can see the clues by comparing Nolan's other works horizontally.

"Memory Fragments", 80.

"Deadly Magic", sixty-six points.

"Batman: The Mystery of the Shadow", 70.

"Batman: The Dark Knight", eighty-four points.

"Batman: The Dark Knight Rises", seventy-eight points.

"Inception", seventy-four points.

In other words, the media review of "Interstellar" ranks third among Nolan's personal works, second only to the two works "Dark Knight" and "Memory Fragments", easily surpassing "Dark Knight Rises" and "Inception". Such a score is already very rare, and there is no doubt whether the reputation of the film critics is good or bad.

In addition, "Interstellar" can also be placed in this summer, and it is clear where the 79-point media comprehensive evaluation can be placed in this summer.

"Captain America 2", seventy.

"Rio Adventure 2", forty-nine points.

"Transparent hacker", forty-two points.

"Amazing Spider-Man 2", fifty-three points.

"Godzilla", sixty-two points.

"X-Men: Reversal of the Future", seventy-five points.

"Maleficent Curse", fifty-six points.

It has been two months since the summer season was unveiled. There are only three large-scale projects with a production cost of more than 100 million yuan. The media comprehensive review has reached the passing line. "X-Men: Reversing the Future" is currently the king of reputation, "Captain America 2" follows closely, and "Godzilla" barely reaches the level of landing.

Now, "Interstellar" has been released. The 79-point evaluation of this work easily surpasses a number of competitors and becomes the highest-rated work in the summer season so far. This once again proves that the partner combination of "Nolan plus Lanle" is still a guarantee of the reputation of the work!

Previously, Warner Bros.'s announcement of the movie upgrade has sparked countless speculations. Some people even believe that "Interstellar" became a abandoned child because of the quality of the finished product is too bad, which is likely to be the first Waterloo in Lanley's career; but now, all the answers have been revealed:

This is still one of the most worthy and most noteworthy works in the summer season of 2014!

:.:
Chapter completed!