The 54th Grammy Awards Ceremony came to an end. There is no doubt that Adele became the biggest winner and became the representative of the new generation of singers overnight; while Renli became the biggest beneficiary.

Not only three phonograph trophys, the album sales and single popularity of "Don Quixote" have been rising sharply, achieving a series of incredible results, and the Billboard charts have only been the most well-known one. On the online forum, the popularity of folk songs has recovered, and even a new group of young fans have emerged.

More importantly, the proportion of folk songs in bar performances in music cities led by New York, Nashville and Memphis has shown a blowout increase.

It is impossible to rely solely on Renly's power to try to reverse the decline of the entire industry; Grammy's commendation and award ceremony speeches sow seeds throughout the North American continent, quietly waiting to take root and sprout.

It was bustling, bustling, and thrilling. An award ceremony was over, and there were countless award ceremony next. This was the award season! The Grammy craze had not yet been fully settled and digested, but all the entertainment reporters began to get busy again.

This week, the American Actors Association Awards will be held, which is one of the most important weather vanes before the Oscars. It can provide important judgments on the trends of the awards in the four major departments of Best Picture and actors.

In this busy and noisy scene, "Entertainment Weekly" quietly threw out a bombshell again. Cornell McGregor wrote a special report, with four pages in a row, and the thrilling title strongly declared their presence:

"Ranley Hall: The man who deceived the whole world!"

"In the present of 2012, the name Renly Hall has become a phenomenon: persistence in art, creation, dreams, freedom, and self, and vivid images not only represent the American dream, but also represent the artistic dream, embodies every artist's pursuit of the balance between business and art, and also embodies the longing of every ordinary person for dreams.

In just one month, this leader of the Y generation has repeatedly created miracles:

The Berlin Film Festival Best Actor Silver Bear Award, Oscar Nomination, and the Grammy Three Graphics trophy. In addition, the one-man concert was held in Madison Square Garden, full; the Don Quixote entered the public eye and sales exploded; and the two consecutive works of "Love Crazy" and "I Against Cancer" have exceeded 100 million in North America.

Is anyone comparable to him? Has anyone not heard of this name?

Obviously, no. This man represents gentlemanly and demeanor, art and profession, and future and dreams. But hiding under this sacrificial lie and a shocking scam. He deceived the whole world. He is another little Frank-william-abagnale-."

Frank William Abanel Jr. is the youngest wanted criminal in FBI history. Later, his personal experience was adapted into the movie "Attack on Punishment", starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks. Simply put, he is the handsomest scam ever.

At the beginning of the article, Cornell listed the brilliant achievements of Lanli in the past period of time, and listed the praise and affirmation of the media. However, the subsequent turning point was to nail Lanli to the pillar of shame in a horrifying way, using Franco Abanel as the category, which was simple but effective, and directly put Lanli into the character image.

"Hype", this is Cornell's accusation. He condemned Lanli's malicious hype, and used a series of means to self-package, creating an image that the public longed to see, and achieved a series of incredible successes, even without any means to hype. This article was written by Cornell to reveal the truth of the matter.

The entry point of the article is "one person's concert".

Cornell once again raised doubts and criticisms about the concert. He chose such a sensitive and special time point to hold the concert, which was already suspicious; what was even more crazy was that in just four days, he actually made an appointment to a top-level venue like Madison Square Garden. It would be almost impossible if he had not planned it six months or even one year in advance.

Heather Cross and Cornell, mentioned by the New York Times, also conducted a detailed investigation.

Before the concert, Lanley and Heather had no intersection at all. There was no trace on social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, photo wall, etc., indicating that the two were friends. Going further, even Lanley and Mount Sinai Hospital could not find the connection.

For a public figure, dedicating himself to charity is a great opportunity to write a lot, but in the past three years, no news has been made that Renly volunteers at Mount Sinai Hospital. This is absolutely abnormal.

"How could anyone recognize Renlil after experiencing the two works of "Fast and Furious 5" and "Love Madness"? If he really went to Mount Sinai Hospital often." This is Cornell's original words, not only questioning Heather, but also questioning the related matters of Mount Sinai Hospital, with the arrow pointing directly to the "New York Times".

Later, Cornell proposed another "hypothesis", assuming that "one person's concert" was indeed held for Heather, and this concert is indeed of special significance.

This assumption is true. In real life, not only artists, but every charity participant is like this. Everyone has their own life. It is impossible for them to stick to those who need help all the time. Most of the time, these objects send out help signals, while charity participants actively provide help and help more people as much as possible.

So, Cornell believes that Renley and Heather never knew each other, but when he learned about Heather's situation and crisis, he agreed to the concert request to realize Heather's dream. This makes sense. But the problem is that it is.

"Heather Cross was officially buried on Monday, February 20th East Coast time. But the helpful protagonist, Renly Hall, stayed in Los Angeles and went to Universal Studios with two children. Not only did he not attend the funeral, he was even having a gala. So, does the connection between Renly and Heather really exist?"

Cornell pointed out that if Renly and Heather had a really close relationship, with Renly's personality, he would never miss the funeral. After all, in March last year, Renly was absent from the Oscars because of her health, let alone the Grammys who were just cross-border to play?

Then, Cornell said that absent from the funeral was not an unforgivable move. But the problem is that "one person's concert" is full of loopholes and is untenable at all. Regarding Heather, about Mount Sinai Hospital, and about concerts, Lanley lies. Now, it's time to ask: Why? Why lie?

There are countless similar charity activities in the entertainment industry. Artists go to the hospital to visit seriously ill children, bring warmth and realize their wishes. Later, when the child passed away, the artist did not need to attend the funeral, and only needed to express condolences on Twitter or Facebook, which is enough.

However, Renli chose a concert with a huge momentum. Why?

Cornell did not give an answer, but again listed a series of data, "After the concert, Grammys, Album of the Year, Newcomer of the Year, Best Alternative Album; Billboard Album List, 'Don Quixote' Champion; Billboard Singles, 'Beast' No. 4. Next, the American Actors' Union Award, and... Oscars."

Without unnecessary explanations, readers can complete Lenovo: malicious hype, college PR.

After that, Cornell added two details:

First, Lanley chose Anne and Alex as the red carpet partner of Grammys. Before that, Lanley had never chosen a partner on the red carpet. Both children were confirmed to be patients at Mount Sinai Hospital. They replaced Heather and became the best shield for the false "charity activities".

Second, on the night of Heather Cross's death, Renley participated in two public relations events. One was Woody Allen, the other was Scott Ruddin and Brad Pitt.

With clear organization, progression layer by layer, and decoupling, Cornell's report is well prepared. Based on the New York Times and on the basis of his previous article, he further developed the ins and outs of things. The "truth" is presented to every reader, and everything is covered.

But, this is not the end.

In the second half of the article, Cornell once again listed the incidents in which Renli suspected of malicious hype and creating an image in the past year.

The negotiations for the sequel of "Fast and Furious" started with Renly demanding a higher pay, and ended with Renly choosing the work of Warner Bros. The preparations for the sequel of "Fast and Furious" were temporarily shelved, and there has been no next move until now.

The Oscar absence incident started with the publicity of "I Against Cancer" and ended with the college expressing magnanimity, the movie fans expressed admiration and understanding, and the box office of "I Against Cancer" successfully exceeded 100 million in North America.

The premiere of "I Against Cancer" begins with a small-cost work that did not hold a grand premiere, but ends with a warm interaction between Renli and the fans, and the box office of the movie also achieved brilliant results.

The Natalie Portman incident started with a scandal between Renly and Natalie, and ended with Natalie winning the Oscar, but was still plagued by the media, while Renly made a name for herself.

At the end, Cornell raised a question, or assumption.

Since the "Pacific War", the discussion on Renly Hall's background in wealth has never been interrupted, but the truth has never been found. Is this a coincidence or an arrangement?

If Lan Li is really an ordinary family with an unknown name, why did he refuse to make it public? Moreover, his development trajectory in the past two years has been so smooth, and he has almost been smooth all the way. He has not seen too much effort or too many twists and turns. He has reached the peak in one go?

"No one should forget that he just turned twenty-two in November."

The short and powerful and meaningful conclusion, Cornell put a perfect end to this well-informed report. Then, waiting for the explosion.
Chapter completed!