There are really many things that big data can do. Even when Takahashi first discovered this uncultivated virgin land, he believed that this was not a field that companies should intervene.

Even if there is enough data and enough detail, tens of thousands of households can even effectively predict a person's survival trajectory, what kind of achievements he will achieve and what position he will have in society.

Because in the eyes of each individual self, it is a very unique life, but in the comparison of big data, similar templates can always be found.

In other words, everyone is actually not special.

In this case, big data can even "predict the future".

If ten thousand households obtain such information and know that some people will have a higher probability of achieving success in the future, then can ten thousand households make early investments?

You can invest in him at a very low price before he becomes successful.

In this case, even big data looks like fortune telling.

But then again, the so-called fortune telling is actually an application of big data.

Judging from a person's family background, educational background, and his own personality, plus the stage where this person is about to appear, if he has enough samples, he can make a certain degree of judgment on his future.

In ancient China, or any ancient country and region of mankind, some people would summarize such results, just because they lacked the guidance of scientific ideas, only knew some superficial things, and turned them into mystery.

For example, in ancient times, fortune telling looked at a person's hands. If the key was not prominent, it would be said that the person was a noble person.

Why do you say so?

Because of the low productivity in ancient China, most people had to engage in production. People who work in heavy physical work will have large joints due to wear and tear of their joints.

If the joints are not big, it means that the person does not have to engage in heavy physical labor. It is nothing wrong to say that such a person is a noble person.

However, for various reasons, the fortune tellers only remember the results and forget the process of reasoning.

Therefore, what they said turned into a black box.

If the knuckles are not prominent, it is a noble person, and if there are no calluses on the hands, it is a noble person among noble people.

A pig was stuffed into this side, and the one that came out was canned pork. And they didn't care at all what was happening from here to there.

In ancient times, when productivity was weak and the level of control over information was not high, that was all that could be done.

In a world where electronic information is everywhere, it is of course easy enough to more accurately grasp a person's destiny.

Moreover, in real life, you will never do anything, you will definitely have feedback on success.

Most of the time there is nothing.

Therefore, having a fast and positive feedback entertainment method will make people fall in love with it quickly.

And ten thousand households can use the data they collect to know what most people are anxious about.

If they can falsely release their anxiety in the game and make them feel pleasure. Can we know that the player will be completely devastated from the negative and positive feedback?

In this case, tens of thousands of households can determine in advance that some people have more development potential, while some people lack more development potential.

Can that make those with development potential develop, those without development potential completely addicted to the game and become the wallet of ten thousand households?

Maybe it sounds cold and even a bit cunning.

But all this is based on professional judgments made by statistics.

In other words, from a high probability, if a person does not affect or induce him to become addicted to games, he will still become a garbage person.

In this way, since the result is destined, why can't he become a useful garbage person for thousands of households?

This may be too cruel for a person.

But for most regimes in the world, this is indeed welcome.

In ancient China, people were ignorant of ignoring the people. Why should people be ignorant? How should people be ignorant? This is all knowledge.

Why fool the people?

Because if the people know more, they will know that the rule of ancient Chinese regimes lacks a kind of legitimacy. It is more like a rogue contract with rogue clauses as the core.

For example, why can some people become emperors?

Just because a fox called out, saying that this person could be the emperor, or when he was born, there was a dragon, a dragon, a tiger, in the sky? Or did he kill a white snake instead of sleeping with a white snake?

If a scholar boasts about these things that he himself does not believe, it can mean that he is fooling the people.

In contrast, it is believed that the emperor used a golden hoe to shovel the ground and ate ten white steamed buns every day, and the country women were more rational.

Because although she based on her own knowledge, she did not understand what kind of wealth the emperor had and what kind of life she lived.

But she still knew that the emperor was still an individual, and a person who was not short of gold, silver, treasures, food, drinks and fun.

How can I use a gold hoe to shovel the floor if I lack gold jewelry?

Then if this woman who lacks knowledge but has a correct foundation knows more and understands where the emperor's wealth comes from, will she start to oppose the emperor?

This is just like why during the Anti-Japanese War, the Northeast Army had the best equipment, but it was easiest to surrender.

Because the soldiers of the Northeast Army are all foolish soldiers.

They know nothing, and they can't know nothing.

Because Zhang Zuolin himself exists as a warlord serving Japan.

If ordinary soldiers want to learn various military knowledge, they have to learn, and they will think during the learning process and will be exposed to nationalist thoughts.

After they became civilized, they would no longer be loyal to Zhang Zuolin, the warlord comprador leader.

In other words, the higher the level of education of a soldier, the more he will run.

Even if his education is higher, he will directly revolt and overthrow Zhang Zuolin.

Therefore, Zhang Zuolin could not make soldiers educated.

If a soldier has no education and low training level, there will be a problem, which is that he has no combat effectiveness.

However, the Northeast Army is well equipped and has many people.

Even if you can't defeat the Japanese, can't defeat other equipment that is inferior to the Northeast Army, and will you not dare to educate other warlords under your command?

Of course it can.

The relationship between the Northeast Army and Zhang Zuolin is basically the relationship between civilians and emperors in ancient China.

Emperors who have injustice will educate the people unless they face huge external crises and die without change.

Otherwise, why educate the people?

Educate the people to resist themselves?

This is also the reason why after the world is unified, people are hungry and hunger in the face of famine. Even in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, all countries have high welfare benefits.

Because the welfare is not high, the country will perish.

When the country perishes, the monarch will surely die, but the people have choices.

As for the unified country, no matter how poor the user experience is, can we change another country?

Therefore, it is said that "invincible foreign patients will die in the country."

Because the user experience is extremely poor, users will revolt to build a new country.
Chapter completed!