It can be seen from this that the war between the Republic and the United States is inevitable.

The key is here. In the event that war is unavoidable, it is necessary for the Republic and the United States to actively promote the destruction of nuclear weapons.

No matter what, nuclear weapons are always a big threat.

Even if the strategic defense system can shoot down most of the coming nuclear warheads, no one dares to be proud of it. Even if only one nuclear warhead falls on the land and falls into remote areas, neither the Republic nor the US authorities will be able to explain it to the public, and it may even lose the initiative and pay a heavier price.

In this way, the Republic and the United States still have one thing in common, which is to actively promote nuclear disarmament.

The problem is that other countries don't think so.

In essence, the comprehensive destruction of nuclear weapons is to create a safe, stable and peaceful world, rather than laying the foundation for the full-scale war of superpowers. This is exactly the original intention of all other London Treaty countries besides the Republic and the United States. Even if everyone knows that the London Treaty was created by the Republic and the United States for world hegemony, no other countries will make concessions on several key issues. It is precisely so. The additional clauses of the treaty clearly stipulate that before the third phase of the reduction, the scale of the conventional military power of each Treaty must be clearly stipulated, and a proportion applicable to all Treaty countries must be formulated.

The problem is that before this, how to calculate conventional military forces was not explained clearly.

Although according to the Pacific proposed by Russia in Liwannian, it clearly stipulates the scale of the forces, equipment and military expenditure of various major military branches, such as land, sea, air and space, and other factors, and then determines the specific scale of the conventional military forces of each country based on the country's land area, population, economic scale, social situation, etc., the possibility of this method is not very high. Not to mention, the same as ten thousand troops, the combat effectiveness of the Republic's army is much higher than that of the army of other countries, or the total displacement of 40,000 tons. The US Navy... is much higher than that of other countries' navies. More importantly, in the basic elements to determine the total scale of the power of Changfu Niuyin, what proportion of each factor is? For example, what proportion of the land area, how much population accounts for, and how much economic scale accounts for? What should the social situation be used as the standard? Among so many questions, as long as one cannot reach an agreement, it is unlikely to restrict conventional military forces.

Because several major decorative countries know that as long as the conventional military forces cannot be reached, Russia and France will not start the third phase of the reduction work in the fierce year, and the "Entertainment Treaty" will become a piece of paper. Therefore, since the Lishu Year, the Republic and the United States have put down their airs and began to discuss the issue of conventional military forces with several major decorative countries such as Russia and France, and have conducted several rounds of multilateral negotiations.

Relatively speaking, the method to limit conventional military forces is relatively simple.

When talking about Tian Nian, several major countries reached an agreement on this issue. That is, the Army and the Marine Corps, according to the total displacement of the main ships, the main ships have combat capabilities such as sea control, anti-submarine, air defense, reconnaissance, surveillance, etc., as well as the ability to deliver troops, with displacement above the United States, and the combat ships directly affiliated with the navy. The Air Force is divided into tactical aviation, strategic aviation and support aviation according to the size of the aircraft group. The Sky Army calculates the total military expenditure according to the total military expenditure and proportion. Both must meet the standards to limit conventional military affairs.

quantity.

The question is, how should we limit Can

For example, what should the general army force be used as the standard? How many army forces should a country like the Republic require?

It can be said that this is the most critical issue.

As mentioned earlier, Russia proposed a solution, but it was not feasible.

For example, during the negotiations, Russia has always insisted that the land area should be used as the living, because the primary value of military power is to defend the country. The land area of ​​a country directly determines the scale of military power. Therefore, when developing military power with the purpose of defense, it is naturally based on the land area. The Republic and the United States are not very opposed to Russia's proposal. After all, the Republic and the United States are also large-scale countries, with calm and advanced military technology. Even if the troops are small, their military strength is above Russia. The problem is that several other countries cannot accept such a proposal. At that time, India was the one who opposed the most firmly. If the land area is based on it, India's military power is only one-third of the Republic. For a country whose population is about to exceed 100 million, this is obviously unacceptable. It is precisely because of this that India took the lead in proposing that the population should be the first benchmark. After all, the army is composed of people, and no matter how large the land area is, if

Without people, if the interests of the people are not protected, the army will not exist and have no value for existence. India's proposal was immediately firmly opposed by Pakistan, because Pakistan's population is only one-eighth of India, and Pakistan will definitely not be able to reduce the size of its army to one-eighth of India. It is precisely because Pakistan first proposed that it should be calculated based on the total economic output. After all, modern warfare is fighting for comprehensive strength based on economy, and without economic support, even the large-scale military power is also a decoration. The problem is that, in this way, Israel firmly disagrees again, because Israel's total economic output is only one-twentieth of that of neighboring Arab countries, and Israel's military power will definitely not be reduced to this proportion. It is precisely because Israel has always insisted that military power should be determined according to social conditions. After all, Israel Shixuan is responding to crises, and the country is always in a state of war and should obtain a higher military power.

There is no doubt that the negotiations are extremely difficult in the face of such a critical issue.

Although all countries know that it is impossible to use a certain factor as a measure, but to set a weight for each factor and then determine the military strength of each country, the differences between countries are still very obvious in terms of this weight ratio setting. The negotiations lasted from the sixth year of the Secretariat to the two nephews, and a basic result was obtained.

According to the agreement reached at the beginning of the year, the United States, Russia, France, India, Pakistan, Israel, Iran, Brazil, Argentina, Egypt and South Africa in a fierce manner. The agreement reached at the beginning of the year: the total army forces shall be subject to the Republic, and the maximum number of Feng Wan ground troops shall be subject to the Republic. The United States shall be subject to the Republic. The maximum number of the United States shall be subject to the United States. The other countries shall be subject to the United States. The maximum number of the Republic shall be subject to the United States. The other countries shall be subject to the United States' total number of tonnages. The Republic shall be subject to the United States' total number of tonnes. The Republic shall be subject to the United States' total number of tonnes. The Republic shall be subject to the United States' first, and the other countries shall be subject to the United States' first, and the maximum number of tonnes shall be subject to the United States' first, and the maximum number of the United States' first, and the other countries shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States shall be subject to the United States' first, and the United States

Between ships and irrigation, the number of air force fighter jets is based on the Republic, and the maximum number of ugly airplanes is maintained. The old battleplanes of tactical fighter jets are built, bombing and picking two forceframes, and supporting four flying telves. The number of US owned by the Republic is the Republic, and the number of other countries is between strong and irrigation. The military expenditure of the Sky Army is based on the United States, and the maximum number of federal government fiscal budgets is output, or the proportion of the Republic is equivalent to that of the defense budget, while other countries are reduced to irrigation based on the United States.

Overall, this is a relatively successful arms control agreement.

There are only two key issues in the entire negotiations: one is the total tonnage of the Republic's naval ships, and the other is the military expenditure of the Sky Army.

When the negotiations began, the Republic asked to make the total tonnage of the ship apart by the United States. The reason was very simple. The Republic had much fewer overseas bases than the United States, so it needed a larger fleet to maintain the country's Cang Shuli's father. For the sake of your pleasing eyes, the Republic also made concessions in the comparison of the army's strength, which shocked the United States. There was enough quota, but the United States did not want to make concessions in the naval share, because in the United States, it was not the army that safeguarded the national interests of the United States, but the navy.

In comparison, negotiations related to the military expenditure of the Tianjun were more difficult. The Republic has always demanded that the military expenditure of the Tianjun be controlled within the strength of national defense expenditure, rather than relaxing it to the point of being unlucky. The reason is very simple. The Republic is at the forefront of the United States in various basic research, so it invests much less in related scientific and technological research. Naturally, the military expenditure of the Tianjun can be reduced, but the United States does not have such good conditions. Under the circumstances at that time, if the United States makes concessions, the United States will definitely lose its control over the heavens in a few years.

Of course, both the Republican authorities and the U.S. authorities know that the arms control agreement is mainly aimed at other countries.

That is why after several years of negotiations, the Republic and the United States made concessions, that is, the Republic gave up its share in the proportion of the army and increased the proportion of the military expenditure of the Heavenly Army to the slump. The United States made concessions on the scale of the naval scale, recognizing that the Republic has the same maritime rights as the United States.

It can be said that this arms control agreement is a prerequisite for the third phase of the London Treaty to cut work.

Although the "hot war" between the Republic and the United States was already very obvious during the reign of the year and war could break out at any time, after the leaders of the Republic and many other countries signed the historic "Stockholm Conventional Military Force Control Agreement" in Stockholm, the capital of Sweden, many people still claimed that this is the cornerstone of world peace and stability.

Of course, according to the laws of each decorative country, the legislative bodies of each decorative country confirm that the agreement will officially develop after the agreement is confirmed.

It is precisely because of this that the major task of the central governments of the Republic, the United States and other major decorative countries is to allow the Stockholm agreement to be passed in the legislature.

Unlike when the London Treaty was signed many years ago, this time several small countries are more proactive.

Before March of the year, the legislatures of South Africa, Brazil, Egypt, Argentina, Pakistan and Israel approved the agreement, and then the legislatures of France, Russia, India and Iran also approved the agreement, but the legislatures of the Republic and the United States have not been moved for a long time.

To be precise, both the Republic and the United States legislature believe that this agreement hurts the country

beneficial.

At the end of the island, the eight oldest senators in the U.S. Senate issued a joint statement. If the White House cannot reasonably explain what the Stockholm Agreement can bring to the United States, they will join forces with other senators to reject the agreement in the Senate. Subsequently, the U.S. House Speaker also publicly stated that he would not support the agreement until he could not see the actual benefits the Stockholm Agreement bring to the United States. And he would call on all Democratic and Democratic lawmakers to vote in the vote. Don’t count the members of the party in the community. In fact, Republican lawmakers can’t understand why the president who moved to the White House again in Xiannian supported such a meaningless agreement.

That's why the agreement was rejected in the U.S. House of Representatives before the end of March of the year.

The problem is that in American society, there are no fewer voters who support the agreement, because most Americans believe that the Stockholm agreement can help the United States reduce military spending, relieve the burden on the people, and return the United States to a track of normal development.

Although according to US law, the US president can submit the same bill three times in a row. If the contact is rejected by Congress three times, the president can apply for the president of the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court supports the president, the Congress will be dissolved and the midterm election will be held in advance. If the Supreme Court supports Congress, an impeachment case will be initiated. Relatively speaking, the US president has greater power than Congress. The final concession is likely to be Congress. But it must be noted that in American history, there has never been a precedent for the president to apply for arbitration to the Supreme Court. There is also a precedent for the dissolution of Congress. For the United States, if the Republican president goes that step, it will inevitably be a political disaster.

In the words of some American news media, an international agreement tore the United States to pieces.

It can be said that at the beginning of the year, almost all Americans were discussing this issue, namely whether to formally sign the Stockholm Agreement.

Similarly, the situation in the Republic is similar.

Although the democratic system of the Republic is not as perfect as the United States, the beginning of the year was a relatively sensitive time. When Yan Jingyu submitted the Stockholm Agreement to the plenary congress, the first thing to consider is not whether the agreement was rejected by the representatives, but whether it would lead the Republic astray.

You know, just two years ago, Yan Jingyu was re-elected as the head of state.
Chapter completed!