There is also the "Emperor's System", which also says: "Huangdi gave birth to Changyi, and Changyi gave birth to Zhuanxu."

Before modern times, in the mainstream Confucian theory, Zhuanxu was the grandson of Huangdi and Changyi's son.

Where is the Korean wave? The Korean wave was eaten?

Some people may not see it here, and think that in the Shanhai Jing, the meaning may be: Changyi gave birth to Han Liu, and Emperor Zhuanxu. Because there is no word Han Liu before the four births of Emperor Zhuanxu, perhaps Han Liu is Zhuanxu's brother.

No, you are wrong to understand this way. As long as you write about marrying someone before you have someone, you must marry someone.

In other words, it was the woman named "A Nu" who gave birth to Emperor Zhuanxu. It means that Emperor Zhuanxu is the legitimate son and the child of the wife. The one who married A Nu was Han Wave.

Emperor Zhuanxu, a Korean Wave student in "The Classic of Hai Nei", was definitely not written by him, because he also described the characteristics of Korean Wave in detail.

Why did such a key figure, Zhuanxu's biological father miss it?

In fact, there are many documents that record that Zhuanxu is Changyi's grandson.

For example, "History of Lu·Volume 14": "The Yuan concubine, the Emperor of Xiling, gave birth to Changyi, Xuanxiao, Longmiao, Changyi, and Dexun lived in Ruoshui. There were three sons, and the eldest was Qianhuang, Ci'an, and Ji Qing. Qianhuang gave birth to Emperor Zhuanxu, which was the Gaoyang clan.

Qianhuang here is Hanguang. These two pictographic characters are the same. In terms of good sound and meaning, they should be called Qianhuang. Writing Hanguang is a copy error.

However, no matter what, the records of Qianhuang are relatively unstable works, and those who record Changyi's birth to Zhuanxu are all official documents.

It is controversial whether Zhuanxu was the grandson of Huangdi or the great-grandson. Now the mainstream historical community recognizes the official Confucian sayings of all dynasties, that is, there is no such person as Gan Huang.

He did not admit that Emperor Zhuanxu had a father named Gan Huang.

Some encyclopedia enthusiasts with unknown circumstances even directly regarded "Ganhuang" as Zhuanxu's real name...

The complete statement of Baidu Encyclopedia is: Emperor Zhuanxu, Gaoyang clan, surnamed Ji, name Ganhuang, grandson of Huangdi, son of Changyi.

I can't refute it, okay, after all, since Sima Qian, official historians of all dynasties have not recognized Gan Huang as Zhuanxu's father.

However, since we are interpreting the "Shan Hai Jing" and regard it as a reliable history.

So under this premise, I will directly regard the Mountains and Seas Sutra as the most respected.

Shanhai Jing says that Changyi gave birth to Han Liu, and Han Liu gave birth to Emperor Zhuanxu, so this is our main premise.

When we stand completely from the standpoint of the Shanhai Jing, we will find that, as the oldest historical history, there is no need to compile such a person.

He is not a very famous person. He has been erased in all dynasties and most people have never heard of it. What's the point of making up such a person?

What's the purpose? Just find an ugly father for Zhuanxu to have an addiction?

First of all, I want to say that the appearance described in the Shanhai Sutra is not ugly, but has special significance.

Second, Gan Huang must not be Zhuanxu’s real name.

In countless articles, as well as Baidu Encyclopedia, Zhuanxu's surname Ji's name Ganhuang was almost a conclusion.

But in fact, there is no evidence...

The only one who believes that Zhuanxu is called Ganhuang has only one document basis, one! The only one!

That is the "Bamboo Anniversary": "Changyi descends to Ruoshui and produces emperors and wasteland."

We all know the "Bamboo Anniversary" that the one who wrote Shun and Yao's imprisonment and refuted the theory of abdication.

However, this paragraph does not say at all. Emperor Gan Huang is Zhuanxu.

Changyi gave birth to Emperor Ganhuang, which does not mean that Emperor Ganhuang could not give birth to Emperor Zhuanxu. "Bamboo Book" originally refuted the Records of the Grand Historian. It records a large number of things that are different from the Records of the Grand Historian and are very "rebellious".

Just because he added the word "Emperor" to Ganhuang, do you think he is Zhuanxu?

According to the passage from "Hai Nei Jing", I can completely believe that Changyi gave birth to Emperor Ganhuang, and Emperor Ganhuang gave birth to Emperor Zhuanxu.

You know, at that time, there was more than Huangdi.

The Yan Emperor was also in power at the same time as Huangdi. Although Yan Emperor was undermined, he was still the name of the emperor. In addition, there is Shaohao overseas.

In ancient times, emperors could be divided into two levels, the Heavenly Emperor and the Pseudo Emperor.

Needless to say, the Emperor of Heaven is the common ruler of the world, so the supreme leader of the clan. The pseudo-emperor is a remote area and a relatively weak control of the Yanhuang forces in the Central Plains. Some more powerful clan and tribal leaders also called themselves emperors in that acre of three-point land.

And where is Ruoshui? Ruoshui is the Yalong River in Sichuan now, which means that the wilderness of Ruoshui refers to the Shuchuan Duguang Plain.

Because of Changyi's "Deson", Huangdi, that is, his virtues and lack of ability, then sealed him into a relatively closed area and managed the Ruoshui Field.

Chang Yi married a local woman there and gave birth to Ganhuang. When he arrived at the generation of Ganhuang, he might have developed very well because of the introduction of the Central Plains technology and his outstanding ability. There were a small number of local people who called him emperors.

Therefore, "Bamboo Book" may be based on the perspective of Shuchuan, recording the name with the tone of local people.

After all, that passage of text will be gone when it comes to "Chan Di Gan Huang". If there is a sentence later on "Chan Di Gan Huang Huang, it is called Gao Yang clan", OK, I admit that this is Zhuan Xu.

But there is no such evidence. How could he ignore the various documents of the document "Gan Huang gave birth to Zhuan Xu" and forcibly pressed the title of Zhuan Xu's father on Zhuan Xu...

This mistake is like Emperor Taizong of Tang, whose surname is Li and whose name is Yuan...

I don’t know what Zhuanxu is called, just call him Zhuanxu, but Gan Huang is definitely not him.

Gan Huang is also an independent person. According to the Shan Hai Sutra, Gan Huang gave birth to Zhuanxu.

Even the word Gan Huang is probably the same as Zhuanxu. It was originally a totem name, and of course it could also refer to its leader.

Therefore, there are phenomenal errors in the "Shan Hai Jing". Korean waves and Gan Huang are exactly the same. This error has not been made in other documents, but the Shan Hai Jing has been made, which is enough to show that the original Shan Hai Jing wrote some ancient hieroglyphics.

So why should I say that Ganhuang is a totem name, or a place name or a country name?

Evidence is the most difficult. First of all, all the documents I mentioned earlier, not "Shan Hai Jing" are considered evidence.

The same sentence, since I define the Shanhai Sutra as the correct premise, on this basis, I will just show evidence casually and act like a hooligan.

Therefore, only the documents of the Shanhai Jing itself, as well as the real things, plus the laws of natural science and reasonable logic can be used as arguments.

Returning to the Classic of Mountains and Seas, look at the "Sea Neijing" again: "The east of the quicksand, west of the black water, there is a country of Chaoyun, a country of Shiji. Huangdi's wife Leizu gave birth to Changyi. Changyi descended to Ruoshui and gave birth to Ganhuang. Ganhuang raised his head, cautious ears, human face, pig's beak, unicorn body, canal trunk, pig's trunk, pig's trunk, pig's trunk, pig's trunk, pig's trunk, pig's trunk, pig's trunk, and pig's trunk, and Naozi called Anu, and gave birth to Emperor Zhuanxu."

The author of Shanhai Jing and did not call Gan Huang the emperor, which shows that from a formal perspective, Gan Huang was not enough to rule the world and was not qualified, and could only be regarded as the overlord tribe of the countryside.

It belongs to the kind of small emperor who led an independent culture and dominated in remote areas. For example, when Huangdi was still in power, he was granted the title of Shaohao, who was founded by Dongyi and established his own country.

As I said before, it is not necessarily a human being, but it is called Emperor Ganhuang, which must refer to individuals. The first half of the sentence "Bamboo Book" uses the word "chan", so it must be to produce a person, rather than to derive a country.

On the other hand, the book "Bamboo" written in this way may just be to say that Changyi gave birth to the leader Diganhuang, and there is no other meaning.

However, the author of Shanhai Jing emphasizes the description of Ganhuang and strange appearances here.

What kind of totem is such a strange style?

I mentioned before that the image description of Gan Huang is not ugly. Why? Because I look at the text, I feel so ugly. It has a pig's beak and a pig's trotter. At first glance, I think it's a monster.

But in fact, if you translate it and rely on the premise that he is a human being first, you will find that it is okay.

The head is raised, and the long and rigid head and neck are pointed, and the ears are small. Needless to say, the human face is his personal face. The pig's beak refers to the mouth protruding toward both sides like a pig.

The body of the lint is a finger tattoo. The trunk is stopped, the legs are long and the feet are like pig's trotters.

If you directly compare the various monster images you see in modern times when you are thinking about, you will mislead yourself because it is obviously over-encouraging.

The ancients described that because of insufficient vocabulary, they still have to think about it as humans and then get closer to these descriptions.

In summary, human appearance is stranger than ordinary people, and there are many exaggerated human appearances?

It really is, and we dug it out... and it happens to be in Ruoshui, which is now Sanxingdui, Guangyang, Shuchuan.

The bronze upright portrait unearthed from Sanxingdui is really strange, but it is indeed a personal appearance. It has a big nose, a very open mouth, a long and straight head and neck, a thin body, and a scaly tattoo on its hands and feet.

Note that I did not say that the description of Ganhuang’s Mountain and Sea Sutra is just like the bronze Homo erectus in Sanxingdui.

First of all, Shanhai Jing does not mention Ganhuang's eyes, and the bronze erectile erectile people unearthed from Sanxingdui have big eyes and even a pervert, with straight eyes bulging like a column of light.

Secondly, one is a description of words and the other is a real comparison. Whether it looks like it is really a matter of opinion and very subjective.

Everyone’s brain tutoring habits are different, and there will be great differences. Some people may feel that they are very similar, while others may feel that they are not.

I personally think that only 30% of them are similar.

But I don't think so.

What is important is style, what is important is time, what is important is location, what is important is this coincidence.

The Shanhai Jing describes the dry wasteland. The bronze statues of Sanxingdui may not have to be pinched according to him...

The desolation may refer to a certain person or a country. Then what is promoted to the head and face of the human refers to the image of the totem.

The Sanxingdui Longxiu people are not totems, but more like the ancient Shu king Cancong. The "longxiu" is clearly recorded in Cancong's history.

What I want to say here is that if the Shanhai Jing is written in real, then Changyi will develop in Ruoshui, Shu, and then his son, the pseudo-Emperor, continues to develop, and married the local Naozi, a woman from Shushan clan, a man named A Nu, who gave birth to Emperor Zhuanxu.

If the above is true.

Then there should be discoveries here in "Ruoshui". In reality, there is Sanxingdui in the wild of Ruoshui.

From a time perspective, the Sanxingdui culture began at 4,600 years ago, which coincided with the time, which was probably the era of Huangdi, Changyi, Ganhuang and Zhuanxu.

The Shanhai Jing describes the strange appearance of strange people in the wilderness, and the style of Sanxingdui bronze ware is also the strange appearance of strange people.

The time, place and even style are quite consistent. If Emperor Zhuanxu was not born in Sanxingdui, then I really couldn't find any other place.

We don’t need to compose the image of the wasteland and any cultural relics.

According to the above analysis, it is sufficient to explain that Ganhuang and the place where the Hei Emperor Zhuanxu was born was Sanxingdui.

Sanxingdui has indeed developed very well, not at all worse than the Central Plains in the same period, and is even better in some aspects.
To be continued...